On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 9:22 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hay...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone who are working on the bug. IIUC the remained task is > to add code comments for avoiding the same mistake again described here: > > > Sounds reasonable. As per analysis till now, it seems removal of new > > assert is correct and we just need to figure out the reason in all > > failure cases as to why the physical slot's restart_lsn goes backward, > > and then add a comment somewhere to ensure that we don't repeat a > > similar mistake in the future. > > I've wrote a draft for that. How do you think?
Looks good to me. I'm going to push this if no objections. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
