Dear Shubham, > The attached patch introduces a new '--table' option that can be > specified after each '--database' argument.
Do we have another example which we consider the ordering of options? I'm unsure for it. Does getopt_long() always return parsed options with the specified order? > The syntax is like that used in 'vacuumdb' > and supports multiple '--table' arguments per database, including > optional column lists and row filters. Vacuumdb nor pg_restore do not accept multiple --database, right? I'm afraid that current API has too complex. Per document: ``` + <term><option>-f <replaceable class="parameter">table</replaceable></option></term> + <term><option>--table=<replaceable class="parameter">table</replaceable></option></term> ``` I feel using "-f" is not suitable. Let's remove the shorten option now. Best regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
