> On 28 Jul 2025, at 17:29, Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> > wrote:
> To move this forward a tiny bit: I would be okay with maintaining a > new getentropy() case. (I'm less excited about getrandom() because of > its reduced reach.) And maybe down the line we should discuss choosing > an option at configure time? I would not be opposed to starting there. -- Daniel Gustafsson
