Hi,

While reading autovacuum.c, I found the following comments in
AutoVacLauncherMain() right before the call to rebuild_database_list();

         * Create the initial database list.  The invariant we want this list to
         * keep is that it's ordered by decreasing next_time.  As soon as an 
entry

However, I couldn't fnd any variable named "next_time". I believe it actually 
refers
to adl_next_worker and the comments should use "next_worker" as is done in 
other nereby
comments. I've attahed a patch to address this.

Regards,
Yugo Nagata


-- 
Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>
diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c b/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c
index 9474095f271..5161ec39d72 100644
--- a/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c
+++ b/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ AutoVacLauncherMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	/*
 	 * Create the initial database list.  The invariant we want this list to
-	 * keep is that it's ordered by decreasing next_time.  As soon as an entry
+	 * keep is that it's ordered by decreasing next_worker.  As soon as an entry
 	 * is updated to a higher time, it will be moved to the front (which is
 	 * correct because the only operation is to add autovacuum_naptime to the
 	 * entry, and time always increases).

Reply via email to