fixed the issues mentioned above in v13. > We probably need to do the sprintf/strcpy before LWLockNewTrancheId(). > Also, I'm thinking we should just use the same tranche for both the DSA and > the dshash table [0] to evade the DSMR_DSA_TRANCHE_SUFFIX problem, i.e., > those tranche names potentially require more space.
v13 also includes a separate patch for this. It removes the DSMR_DSA_TRANCHE_SUFFIX, and dsh and dsa now use the same user defined tranche. The tranche name is also limited to the max length of a named tranche, MAX_NAMED_TRANCHES_NAME_LEN, coming from lwlock.h -- Sami
v13-0002-Tests-for-LWLock-tranche-registration-improvemen.patch
Description: Binary data
v13-0001-Improve-LWLock-tranche-registration.patch
Description: Binary data
v13-0003-Remove-the-DSA-suffix-for-tranches-created-with-.patch
Description: Binary data