On 22.08.25 07:09, Michael Paquier wrote:
An extra thing is a suggested change for pg_nextpower2_32(), to use a uint64 instead of a uint32 as argument, which is caused by next_pow2_int64() and next_pow2_int(), that both used int64 previously.
That seems highly confusing. What is the meaning of the "32" then? If you need 64-bit behavior, use the variant with "64" in the name.