On Thu Sep 4, 2025 at 8:02 PM -03, Rishu Bagga wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 7:14 AM Arseniy Mukhin > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Interesting, have you shared your patch and results somewhere? IIUC >> Tom's approach resolves this bug, because with it we have queue >> entries produced by committed transactions only, so we don't need to >> check their status and don't have dependency on clog. > > I was eventually able to get better numbers with the patch after using > a substantial number of connections, so I have now posted it here. [1]. > Thanks for sharing the patch! I'll reserve some time to test and review.
-- Matheus Alcantara
