On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 2:59 PM Dilip Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 10:16 AM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 for the idea. So I see we already have the parallel apply workers > for the large streaming transaction so I am trying to think what > additional problem we need to solve here. IIUC we are actually > parallely applying the transaction which were actually running > parallel on the publisher and commits are actually applied in serial > order. Whereas now we are trying to parallel apply the small > transactions so we are not controlling the commit apply order at the > leader worker so we need extra handling of dependency and also we need > to track which transaction we need to apply and which we need to skip > after the restarts as well. Is that right? >
Right. > I am reading the proposal and POC patch in more detail to get the > fundamentals of the design and will share my thoughts. > Thanks. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
