On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 6:20 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote: > yikes, you are right about the "reason" member. Attached 0002 removes > it, and I'll go ahead and fix it in the back branches too.
I think changing this in the back-branches is a super-bad idea. If you want, you can add a comment in the back-branches saying "oops, we shipped a field that isn't used for anything", but changing the struct definition is very likely to make 0 people happy and >0 people unhappy. On the other hand, changing this in master is a good idea and you should go ahead and do that before this creates any more confusion. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
