On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 10:46 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > > Changing the warning to an error wouldn't bother me a great deal, but > > we'd probably need more than just you voting for that alternative to > > justify overturning longstanding behavior. > > Agreed.
I think I'm starting to lean in the direction of "error rather than warning", personally... Not a real vote yet; I'm not sure I understand the compatibility fallout. Like, who would be angry if we did that? No opinion on group read. But we should absolutely clarify the warning message. --Jacob
