On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:59 PM Thomas Munro <[email protected]> wrote: > (3) even though it should > win for Jeff's test case by skipping workers entirely if an initial > RWF_NOWAIT attempt succeeds, you could presumably change some > parameters and make it lose
... not to mention that with v19 patches even that effect should go away when it automatically scales the worker pool to the perfect™ size.
