On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 6:35 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote: > After further study, this should not be a problem, since the address of > &gplan->plan is the same as gplan, but the code is a little bit confusing > at first glance, I think *return (Plan *) gplan* is easier to understand > but I don't insist ;)
Thanks for looking into it. Stylistically, I prefer the style without the cast, but the effect is the same. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
