> On 24 Sep 2025, at 13:37, Christoph Berg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Re: Daniel Gustafsson >> It seems a bit restrictive to require the openssl binary which is test-only, >> since we allow building with ssl but without TAP support (which is where the >> openssl binary is used). > > Ok, but then the error messages should be better. This was found > because a fellow Debian developer was smart enough to spot the extra > space in that " x509" error message... (And another one knew about > this difference between the different build environments.)
If we make it optional and skip the relevant tests then there wouldn't be any errors messages? I do agree that all messaging around should be very clear though, so it's obvious why tests were skipped. Do you feel like expanding your patch or should I? -- Daniel Gustafsson
