> On 25 Sep 2025, at 10:01, Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote:

> There are 5 different cases, showing that there is not a unique way for what 
> function name should be put to xxInternal() functions’ comment.
> 
> Is it deserve to take this opportunity to make all of them in a consistent 
> format?

We don't have a policy on how to do function comments, and none of these
examples strike me as particularly confusing.  I don't think there is much
value in the churn from changing these from one flavor or another as they
aren't wrong.

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Reply via email to