On 23.09.25 16:17, Nathan Bossart wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
That said, I did go overboard here and converted all the struct/union
combinations I could find, but I'm not necessarily proposing to apply
all of them. I'm proposing patches 0001 through 0004, which are
relatively simple or in areas that have already changed a few times
recently (so backpatching would not be trivial anyway), and/or they
are somewhat close to my heart because they originally motivated this
work a long time ago. But if someone finds among the other patches
one that they particularly like, we could add that one as well.
I would have used this in the DSM registry if it was available. Patch
attached.
This looks good to me, and also mostly harmless in terms of backpatching.
