On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 11:29 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Amit, Ashutosh, > > > Thanks for the analysis. I think we should go with the simple patch > > proposed in this thread to improve this test and that too only for > > HEAD. > > To confirm, are you suggesting something like attached? It initially creates > MVs > on both instances, then ensure REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW won't be replicated. > It also fixed the issue reported by Грем. >
What difference REFRESH will make instead of CREATE? I think it is okay to just patch what is posted by the reporter in the first email [1] in this thread. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANV9Qw5HD7%3DFp4nox2O7DoVctHoabRRVW9Soo4A%3DQipqW5B%3DTg%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
