On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 10:03:32AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > That makes sense. Done in 0001 attached.
Done this one, with a tweak to use directly the index name, which is a primary key from the test table. > Thanks! Attached v3, split in 2 sub patches as discussed above (0002 is same > as v2 except that the tests has been changed due to 0001). And applied this one as well after a few tweaks, mainly consistency in the code, with what should be the proper format bumps (thanks for the notes in your proposed commit message). -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
