On 19 Sep 2025, at 10:20, Aleksander Alekseev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, this is how we typically test cases like this. IMO adding a test > module would be helpful. It can be reused for other scenarios. Here is an updated patch set. - 0001 is unchanged. - 0002 contains the module that tests the correct behavior of get_actual_variable_range for non-returning ordering indices. It contains a copy of the btree handler function with its index-only capabilities removed. If you apply patch 0002 on master without 0001, you will see that the test returns an error (ERROR: no data returned for index-only scan) as it tries to use the index in get_actual_variable_range, which shouldn’t be the case. Best, Maxime Schoemans
v2-0001-Check-that-index-can-return-in-get_actual_variabl.patch
Description: Binary data
v2-0002-Add-btree_noreturn-module-as-example-of-a-non-ret.patch
Description: Binary data
