On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 5:11 PM Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> It took me some time to understand this fix. My most confusing was that once 
> overwrite happens, how a reader head to catch up again? Finally I figured it 
> out:
>
> ```
> +               lag_tracker->read_heads[head] =
> +                       (lag_tracker->write_head + 1) % 
> LAG_TRACKER_BUFFER_SIZE;
> ```
>
> "(lag_tracker->write_head + 1) % LAG_TRACKER_BUFFER_SIZE” points to the 
> oldest LSN in the ring, from where an overflowed reader head starts to catch 
> up.
>
> I have no comment on the code change. Nice patch!

Thanks for the review!

I've updated the source comment to make the code easier to understand.
The updated patch is attached.


> All I wonder is if we can add a TAP test for this fix?

I think it would be good to add a test for this fix, but reproducing
the condition
where the buffer fills up and the slowest read entry overflows takes a time.
Because of that, I'm not sure adding such a potentially slow test is a
good idea.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao

Attachment: v2-0001-Fix-stalled-lag-columns-in-pg_stat_replication-wh.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to