> On 22 Oct 2025, at 02:57, Matt Smith (matts3) <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is all ok for now, but I'm wondering if meson changes the default 
> behavior in a future version, how postgres would be able to support the old 
> way of following symlinks with said future version. 

Do you think it would be appropriate/helpful to add a comment for the future in
the project() portion of meson.build, where we already comment on meson
versions?

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Reply via email to