On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 05:36:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > So, okay, that's a perfectly respectable thing to do, and I can't > really fault Michael or Jian for not having tested its effects on > sepgsql. But how come it took this long to notice?
Oops. I would have taken care of that should I have known... I check the compilation of sepgsql, but the tests require dependencies that are too heavy so it has always been some copy-paste operation when the buildfarm got angry on this test suite (combined with hopes to not break the tests). > I think that rhinoceros is the only BF member testing with > --with-selinux. I recall so, yes. > Anyway, we seem to need the attached in v18 and HEAD, > and we really ought to get BF coverage going again. Thanks for sending a patch (and 0758111f5d35)! -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
