On 2025-Oct-22, Tom Lane wrote: > Interesting. I also realized, after re-reading the snippet I showed, > that gcc is treating the code leading up to a CALL instruction as a > separate basic block from the code following the CALL. So that begs > the question of which count is shown for the function call's line > at the source-code level. It'd only differ when the function throws > an error, presumably.
Maybe we should give up on GCC and use clang for the coverage report? -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "La gente vulgar sólo piensa en pasar el tiempo; el que tiene talento, en aprovecharlo"
