On Fri, 2025-10-24 at 18:43 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > Unless char32_t is solely used for the Unicode code point data, I > think it would be better to define something like "pg_unicode" and > use > it instead of directly using char32_t because it would be cleaner for > code readers.
That was my original idea, but then I saw that apparently char32_t is intended for Unicode code points: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/The-char32_005ft-type.html But I am also OK with a new type if others find it more readable. Regards, Jeff Davis
