On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 11:10:55AM +0800, wenhui qiu wrote: > Typically, DBAs avoid setting autovacuum_freeze_max_age too close to > vacuum_failsafe_age. Therefore, your logic most likely uses the > vacuum_failsafe_age value. > Would taking the average of the two be a better approach?
That approach would begin aggressively scaling the priority of tables sooner, but I don't know if that's strictly better. In any case, I'd like to avoid making the score calculation too magical. -- nathan
