> On 29 Oct 2025, at 10:41, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22.10.25 10:59, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 1 Sep 2025, at 07:27, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I suggest that instead of adding the context to the Port structure, make a >>> separate context struct for this purpose, for example: >> Fair enough, done in the attached. > > This looks good to me. (I would not have the CallbackErr typedef, since that > additional abstraction doesn't buy anything. But it's a small difference.) Thanks, I removed the typedef and went ahead with this patch. >> (sidenote; if our thread >> local store code will use TLS then be-secure-openssl.c will be challenging to >> read =)). > > Yes, let's rename it to SSL to avoid this. ;-) Touché! =) -- Daniel Gustafsson
