On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 4:46 PM Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 13, 2025, at 13:17, Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > While reviewing the recent patches for SEQUENCE documentation I found > > [1] a few more instances where the <structfield> tag should have been > > used for some of the sequence fields (per the recent push [2]). > > > > Good catch. LGTM. I rendered the html pages and viewed them, the pages also > look good. >
Why do we think using <structfield> tag is appropriate instead of the current <literal> tag? The explanation of the is_called says: "Sets the sequence object's current value, and optionally its is_called flag.", so from "object's current value", are we deducing it is the same as struct? Ideally, it should be used to mark up the name of a field in a struct which is close to what we are doing here. Do we have a similar usage at other places in the docs? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
