On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 at 13:53, David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote: > v2-0001 wraps the format string as suggested by Heikki, v3-0001 uses > unsigned long long as suggested by Peter. > > v2-0002 is updated to use size_t instead of Size, per Heikki > > Any further opinions or votes on v2-0001 vs v3-0001?
Nobody seems to feel strongly either way, so I looked again and thought that using uint64 is nicer as the size of the type is explicit. We do want a 64-bit type here, not something bigger, which in theory, long long could be. The less readable format, IMO seemed like an ok trade-off to be explicit about the type's size. With that, I pushed the CATCACHE_STATS patch. I also pushed the MemSet/MemSetAligned one too. Thanks for looking. David
