> On Nov 24, 2025, at 16:07, Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > 0006, 0007 look good, no comment. I missed a nit comment in 0007: 7 - 0007 ``` + * To handle recovery conflict during logical decoding on standby, we must know + * if the table is a catalog table. Note that in visibilitymapdefs.h + * VISIBLITYMAP_XLOG_CATALOG_REL is also defined as (1 << 2). xl_heap_prune + * records should use XLHP_IS_CATALOG_REL, not VISIBILIYTMAP_XLOG_CATALOG_REL -- + * even if they only contain updates to the VM. ``` VISIBLITYMAP_XLOG_CATALOG_REL missed “I” after “B”. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and... Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL... Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL... Melanie Plageman
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL... Chao Li
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce... Chao Li
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to re... Chao Li
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to re... Melanie Plageman
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce... Melanie Plageman
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL... Andres Freund
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce... Chao Li
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce... Kirill Reshke
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to re... Kirill Reshke
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible t... Melanie Plageman
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_visi... Kirill Reshke
- Re: eliminate xl_heap_... Melanie Plageman
