Hi,
> On Dec 2, 2025, at 18:56, Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think a much broader evaluation will be needed, comparing not just the > planning time, but also the quality of the final plan. Which for the > starjoin tests does not really matter, as the plans are all equal in > this regard. Many thanks for your feedback. You are absolutely right — plan quality is also very important. In my initial email I only showed the improvements in planning time, but did not provide results regarding plan quality. I will run tests on more complex join scenarios, evaluating both planning time and plan quality. Thanks again! -- Best regards, Chengpeng Yan
