On Sun, Dec 7, 2025 at 3:09 PM David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote:
> The comment is effectively > explaining that we don't want to make the array big enough so that a > malloc will always be required. Doesn't what you are saying contradict both the formula (the +1 post-division) and the comments: /* * Initial size of array must be more than ALLOCSET_SEPARATE_THRESHOLD; * see comments in grow_memtuples(). */ state->memtupsize = INITIAL_MEMTUPSIZE; state->memtuples = NULL; and in grow_memtuples: * That shouldn't happen because we chose the * initial array size large enough to ensure that palloc will be treating * both old and new arrays as separate chunks. ? David J.
