Hi,

On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 at 20:49, Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-12-11 11:45:01 -0600, Bryan Green wrote:
> > On 12/11/2025 10:05 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2025-12-11 15:43:36 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >> On 10.12.25 01:45, Bryan Green wrote:
> > >>> The attached patch takes a pragmatic approach: for gettext 0.20.1+, we
> > >>> avoid triggering the bug by using Windows locale format instead of
> > >>> calling IsoLocaleName(). This works because gettext 0.20.1+ internally
> > >>> converts the Windows format back to POSIX for catalog lookups, whereas
> > >>> 0.19.8 and earlier need POSIX format directly.
> > >>
> > >> I can confirm that this patch fixes the performance deviation from
> > >> activating --enable-nls on Windows (tested with MSYS2/UCRT64).
> > >
> > > FWIW, Bilal and I had, IIRC, explicitly not enabled on windows CI because 
> > > it
> > > made the build process even slower. But perhaps we should re-measure the
> > > difference and re-consider?
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > Andres Freund
> > As long as you use Windows locale names once this patch is in place.
> > Posix locale names will still incur the performance hit until the next
> > gettext release. Once using the next gettext release there will not be a
> > performance penalty for using an invalid locale on Windows.
>
> What I was referring to was that *building* with NLS support is slower than
> building without, which is the reason why CI currently isn't testing NLS in
> the "Windows - Server 2022, MinGW64 - Meson" task. Even with ccache, the CI
> builds with mingw are pretty darn slow, adding the overhead of creating a good
> number of additional files is (or was, haven't retested this recently) making
> it even slower.

I tested this and the timings (minute:seconds) of running tests:

MinGW + NLS [1]: 16:01
MinGW + Patch + NLS [2]: 13:57

I ran the CI again to make sure and the speed up was similar.

[1] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5944143274311680
[2] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5477244862201856

-- 
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft


Reply via email to