Hi Man, On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 2:51 PM zengman <[email protected]> wrote: > I just noticed two relatively large commits. I recall that not long ago we > started attempting to adopt `palloc_object` and `palloc_array` in many places, > yet in these two commits, some sections have used the new approach while > others have not. > Perhaps we could standardize the coding style for consistency. > > src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c > src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c
Could you, please, check the attached patch? ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
v1-0001-Fix-usage-of-palloc-in-MERGE-SPLIT-PARTITION-s-co.patch
Description: Binary data
