On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 4:36 AM Soumya S Murali
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> With reference to the last patches (v11) I received [1] and while reviewing 
> Melanie’s latest feedback, I understood that PageSetBatchChecksumInplace() is 
> currently WIP and depends on upcoming changes to hint-bit locking. It will be 
> contrary to the flow if I propose new functional changes to checksum batching 
> at this time. So for now I will focus on preparatory or documentation 
> improvements until I get the updates on dependencies.
> Regarding my patch attached, the patch introduces write-combining during 
> checkpoints by batching contiguous buffers and allowing them to be written 
> using vectorized I/O. My patch includes write-combining for checkpoint buffer 
> flushes, contiguous buffer batching, Preserved WAL ordering, locking, and 
> buffer state invariants. The change is currently limited to the checkpointer 
> path (BufferSync()). So far I tested my implementation and found that all the 
> regression (233 tests) and isolation tests (121 tests) got passed, the manual 
> pgbench validation completed successfully and also verified pg_stat_bgwriter 
> counters before and after checkpoints. So far the implementation is stable in 
> my system.

Can you explain how your implementation differs from what was posted
in v11 0006 [1]? That implements checkpointer write combining. I'm
open to ideas for improving the code, but I don't understand how your
patch is supposed to fit into the ongoing work on this thread.

- Melanie

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_ZiEpE_EHww3S3-E3iznybdnX8mXSO7Wsuru7%3DP9Y%3DczQ%40mail.gmail.com


Reply via email to