Hi, Thank you for your reply!
> Is code like this ever actually relevant for performance? In cases where the > compiler can't also optimize the code? Unless it is a legitimate bottleneck, > adding more complicated code to optimize the case doesn't make sense. I just think the patch isn't that complicated. > The benchmark really should show performance benefits in at least somewhat > realistic cases (i.e. real users of the functions, even if the workload is a > bit more extreme than it'd be most of the time). Yeah, this makes sense to me. Maybe I need to think more on it. -- Regards, ChangAo Chen
