On Thu, Dec 25, 2025 at 12:50:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > That would be my preferred answer, but after a quick census of the > buildfarm I'm not sure we can get away with it. The animals that > are showing these warnings are all running RHEL 10 or clones of it, > which is going to be in-support till 2035 or so. Maybe Red Hat > will upgrade to a newer libxml2 version than whatever they chose > for RHEL 10.0, but I would not count on it.
Hmm. Having to deal with these warnings until 2035 kind of sucks. Do you think that it be worth forcing the use of -Wno-deprecated-declarations only for versions older than 2.13.3 in the Makefiles where we could see these warnings? As a whole, this kind of enforcement gives me mixed feelings, because it would also mean that we would miss what looks like legit deprecation warnings that we had better look at and study, even for LLVM. At least not enforcing any policy lets us know about these issues. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
