On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 4:04 AM Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Dec 29, 2025, at 16:20, zourenli <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > <v1-0001-corrects-minor-grammatical-issues-in-comment-of-b.patch>
>
> Both fixes look unambiguously correct to me:
>
>     • “This is not generic routine” -> “This is not a generic routine”
>     • “used for REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table” -> “used for a REPLICA IDENTITY 
> FULL table”
>

LGTM.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.


Reply via email to