On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 8:09 PM VASUKI M <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah,the proposed idea makes sense to me,as users will almost see at the end > of log messages it will be easy to find out what is the checkpoint reason. > +1 for it.
If we do this, it would be better to keep the wording consistent between the checkpoint starting and completion messages. For example, the patch represents CHECKPOINT_FAST as "immediate", while the checkpoint starting message uses "fast"; those should match. I'm also wondering why this information is currently included only in the checkpoint starting message. I tried to find any past discussion on this, but couldn’t find one. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
