Re: Inconsistent terminology for -j/--jobs option in documentation

[Tatsuro Yamada]

Hi Michael-san,

On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 3:27 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> At some degree, yes, see 540c39cc56f5.
>

Thank you for committing the patch!

Regards,
Tatsuro Yamada