Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
> On 23.01.26 23:18, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, yeah, their bug #70066 shows clearly that the __attribute__
>> spelling should work. But I think we'd better make the cutoff be
>> version 9 not version 6, because that same bug is quite clear
>> about when they fixed it. The lack of complaints from the buildfarm
>> may just indicate a lack of animals running the intermediate versions.
> Ok, done that way.
Sigh ... that did not work. Various BF animals are now blowing up in
src/backend/jit/llvm because this macro definition breaks some usages
of alignas() in LLVM header files.
Maybe we could #define alignas this way for the two exposed usages
and then #undef afterwards?
regards, tom lane
