On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 09:46:51AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 12:25:33AM -0800, Nikhil Kumar Veldanda wrote: >> The `SELECT count(*) FROM :reltoastname` assertion is a bit brittle >> for `STORAGE EXTENDED`: depending on the toast compression method / >> effectiveness, the value may end up as >1 chunk, which would flip the >> expected count(*) = 1. Prefer SELECT count(DISTINCT chunk_id) FROM >> :reltoastname (or WHERE chunk_seq = 0) and adjust expected. > > Yeah, this suggestion sounds sensible and that would still notice what > I was able to break.
I have settled down to the addition of a qual based on chunk_seq, being consistent with the other test, at the end, then applied the result as 168765e5d42b. Thanks for the suggestions, Nikhil. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
