On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'd go with #2, personally.  It does seem that the costing needs work,
> but it's not clear to me that we know what to change, so it's kinda
> late to propose #3 for v11.

+1. I also favor option #2.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Reply via email to