On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 11:38:51AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: > Seems reasonable to me. While it's only a test module, folks might use it > as a starting point for their own module, so IMHO it's worth setting a good > example. I'll wait for a couple, but otherwise I'll go commit this soon.
Committed. I ended up moving the new line to the background worker registration loop so that we can add the worker number to the name, too. -- nathan
