On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 2:44 AM Richard Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I agree that we should consider startup cost for partial paths, > given that cost_gather (and cost_gather_merge) accounts for the > subpath's startup_cost when calculating the cost of the Gather path. > > The changes LGTM. I noticed one comment that may need to be updated > accordingly: > > * As in add_path, the partial_pathlist is kept sorted with the cheapest > * total path in front. ... > > This is not true anymore. The partial_pathlist is now sorted by > disabled_nodes and then by cheapest total cost.
Thanks. I have committed 0001 after adjusting that comment. Here's the remaining patch once again. No comments on this one? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v56-0001-Consider-startup-cost-as-a-figure-of-merit-for-p.patch
Description: Binary data
