On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 12:50:35PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 at 03:09, Manni Wood <[email protected]> wrote: >> Nazir, I ran my benchmarks with more rows this time --- as many rows as >> would fit on my test computers without exhausting their RAM disks. That >> seems to have brought things more into line with what Ayoub saw. I did >> get some small regressions, but I suspect those are not a big deal. (For >> instance, on both machines I also noticed the occasional "truncate >> table" would take longer than the others, despite my scripts' best >> efforts to steady a CPU core and pin postmaster and children to that >> core.)
Yeah, the couple of small regressions seem close to (or below) the noise level, and IIUC yours were the only benchmarks that showed them, anyway. Plus, I think we'll need this change regardless as a prerequisite for the SIMD work. > Thank you both for the benchmarks. Results look good to me! Committed that part. -- nathan
