Hi Álvaro, I think we can make it work
I just noticed that pg_regress provisioned `get_alternative_expectfile` for
that, and I see examples like `char{,_1,_2}.out`, but that is horrible for
maintenance (I personally think that we could have the input and expected
output in one single file).
I added a patch that would support selective matching. Check the README.md,
it contains some human readable instructions that I also used to test the
implementation. `make self-test` extracts examples from README.md and
runs pg_regress on them, i.e. test the implementation on the documentation.
https://asciinema.org/a/lFzGnv73mmOqyLWw
By default it ignores comments and spaces, and in the expected file you can
enable/disable other things, e.g. ignoring numbers in specific lines would
probably help with the 32kB failures.
Regards,
Alexandre
On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 9:42 PM Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2026-Feb-20, Alexandre Felipe wrote:
>
> > What about pattern matching? being able to write regular expressions on
> the
> > expected outputs?
>
> I doubt that will work.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E —
> https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
> "Entristecido, Wutra (canción de Las Barreras)
> echa a Freyr a rodar
> y a nosotros al mar"
>
v1-0001-Relaxed-matching-in-regress.patch
Description: Binary data
