On 2/23/2026 2:16 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hello, thanks for following up.
> 
> However, I was going over the commit message one final time after your
> reply, and I noticed that SymInitialize()'s documentation says quite
> explicitly:
> 
> "Do not use the handle returned by GetCurrentProcess"
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/dbghelp/nf-dbghelp-syminitialize
> 
> which is exactly what we do with this patch.
> 
> I think we should DuplicateHandle() on the GetCurrentProcess() handle
> (which then obviously needs CloseHandle afterwards).  Would you agree?
> 
> Here's the whole thing again with edited commit message and some trivial
> stylistic changes.
> 
> 
> I was amused to discover that Solaris, macOS and FreeBSD all copied the
> backtrace() interface from glibc, and the only platform in the buildfarm
> other than Windows that seems to lack support for backtraces is Alpine
> Linux.
> 
> Regards
> 
Ouch.  Can't believe I missed that.  Yeah, that is a no go.  We could
use openprocess with the getcurrentprocessid.  Let me look this over.
And yes, regardless of which way we do it we will need a CloseHandle.

-- 
Bryan Green
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com


Reply via email to