> On 25 Feb 2026, at 13:41, Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Feb 25, 2026, at 18:21, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 25 Feb 2026, at 07:31, yangyz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 2.Performance Overhead >>> In each iteration, the entire buffer of size LZ4_CHUNK_SZ (potentially >>> several megabytes) is zero-initialized. Since these memory blocks are >>> immediately overwritten by decompressed data, this zeroing operation >>> constitutes an unnecessary consumption of CPU resources. >> >> When proposing a performance improvement it's important to provide some level >> of benchmarks to show the improvement. Is removing this memset noticeable? > > I don’t think this patch is about performance. Although removing the memset > might save a few CPU cycles, the real benefit seems to be cleanup and > consistency. The memset appears unnecessary, and similar functions don’t use > it, so I think this change mainly improves maintainability.
I would argue the opposite, clearing a buffer before passing it to an external library function writing to it seems the right thing to do unless it can be proven to regress performance too much. Also, "appears unnecessary" doesn't instill enough confidence to perform a change IMO. -- Daniel Gustafsson
