On 2/27/26 5:34 AM, David Rowley wrote:
I'll stand by what I said earlier, that if people don't know what
partial aggregation is that we should aim to better explain what it
is. Renaming it won't magically inform people what it is and will
likely just confuse all the people who already know what it is. I
think you're about 10 years too late to bikeshed names for this.
+1
There is nothing wrong with calling them partial aggregates. No name is
likely to never confuse anyone and I do not see any big issue with
partial in particular. Both parallel and batch, as suggested in this
thread, would be worse.
--
Andreas Karlsson
Percona
