On Wed, 2026-03-11 at 15:01 +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote: > > On 11 Mar 2026, at 03:18, Laurenz Albe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The question is whether the overall benefits of your proposal (which > > certainly makes sense > > in a setup like you describe) would be worth a performance and resource > > usage regression like > > the one I described above. Or can you see a way to modify your approach so > > that that problem > > can be avoided? > > Version proposed by Andrew Jackson [0] adds a connection option > check_all_addrs. Off by default. > This resolves potential problems of existing users.
Ah, ok, I didn't read the patch. If resolving all addresses is disabled by default and has to be enabled explicitly, I have no objection. Yours, Laurenz Albe
