On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 12:20:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> writes: >> Hmm, this looks like behaviour that goes a long way back. Should we >> backpatch this fix? > > I wouldn't bother. At the end of the day you get the same failure > report anyway.
Agreed, I don't think back-patching is worth the (probably low) risk. The latest patch for v19 looks good to me. I recently committed some stuff in this area, so I can take care of committing this one, too. -- nathan
